English
Graphic

Policy brief: Turmoil in Belgium and elsewhere…

By Claire Roumet on 6 octobre 2016

Even though the British Prime Minister gave the go-ahead to the construction of a nuclear plant in September, thus condemning tax-payers on both sides of the Channel to watch passively how public money will be used to shore up a centralised system, poorly adapted to the future, favourable winds are also blowing on the energy sector. We are definitely at a crossroads as testify the following examples, a few among many illustrating the powers at work and the role played by the various stakeholders.

Let’s start with a Belgian story, but highly representative of the complexity local authorities have to deal with when they have to take important decisions that affect the future of the energy system. In Flanders, 17 local companies share decision-making regarding the distribution network managed by Eandis. The main political parties have been working for months on an agreement preparing a merger not only to improve efficiency, but also to attract external investors and find a substitute to Electrabel (which, according to the European Directive on the opening-up of the market, cannot be involved in both energy production and distribution). An open call for capital was launched to attract major international pension funds. But “State Grid China”, a Chinese state-controlled company, made the best offer by far - one no mayor could turn down - with 100-year investment clauses (the call was for 14% of the capital).

The Greens, and especially civil society, were fiercely against this take-over, arguing that the capital required could have easily been raised through crowdfunding, thus giving citizens an opportunity to take ownership of the networks and to gain a better understanding of the challenges of energy transition. Local financing would also preclude further centralisation of the networks at a time when devolution is on everyone’s lips, with the local business model being already well tried and proven (in German-speaking and Scandinavian countries). Many legal challenges were considered, all very imaginative, such as using the Directive on the opening-up of the market to block State Grid China, a company involved in the production, distribution and transmission of energy (How ironic !). But it was finally the Flemish energy regulator which provided the solution, just before the vote of 3rd October, by reminding the city of Antwerp that, contrary to their request, they would no longer be able to offer reduced rates, since centralisation of the distribution networks would impose a single tariff on the whole area. This was politically unacceptable for Antwerp which currently offers a service to households which is 100 euros cheaper annually. But without Antwerp, “State Grid China” was no longer interested.

An accelerator for a bottom-up transition ?

Will this happy-ending help speed up the transition by and for citizens, will it trigger a reflexion on what investment is really necessary and will it help the region regain control of the tools it needs to use local resources (including financial ones) ?

In Spain, a campaign has been launched by those cities run by citizens’ coalitions with three demands : “reclaim competencies, reclaim financing and municipalise utilities” as a reaction to a national government law that appears to severely restrict local action.

In Germany, the State of Schleswig-Holstein has announced its ambition to become 100% renewable by 2035 by relying on regional industries and local SMEs, like many local authorities across Europe engaged in an ambitious transition process, as detailed in our latest publication (English version to come !) : www.energy-cities.eu/Vers-des-villes-100-energies-renouvelables.

In France, Nantes has just launched its Debate on the energy transition under the slogan : “The energy transition is about us” - another example of a decentralised approach aimed at liberating …local energy… and new public policies….

This is why, despite the signing of the Hinkley Point agreement, I would say that the keyword for this month is D… for Devolution…..

  RSS Fil RSS
Members
Carte des membres
BIENVENUE AUX NOUVEAUX MEMBRES :
Union of Communities of Armenia (AM) Armenia | Agencia de Energia & Ambiente da Arrabida - Energy agency Portugal | Mariupol Ukraine | Cities Northern Netherlands (NL) Belgium | Lisboa e-nova - Energy agency Portugal
Opinions
Opinions
Evénements à venir
Energy Cities’ 2017 Conference - 2050 Starts Today
Du 26 au 28 avril

Covenant of Mayors workshop : The Covenant of Mayors going national - Collaboration perspectives
Mercredi 26 avril 09:00-15:00

Kick-off : Smarter Together Club of Cities
Mercredi 26 avril 12:00-14:30

A European energy system in 3D ? Rethinking the EU’s energy and climate policies
Mercredi 26 avril 12:30-15:00

EEW3 Webinar : Energy Efficiency Recommendations - Focus on Financing
Jeudi 4 mai 10:00-11:30

Tous les événements à venir >>
Line
Retrouvez Energy Cities sur
Line
separator
Vous êtes ici : Energy Cities, Local authorities in energy transition. > Newsletters > Newsletter - Energy Cities - en > 244 - October 2016

A propos
L'association
Conseil d'Administration
Les membres
L'équipe
Offre d'emploi
Stages
Venir nous voir
Positions
Adherer
Comment adhérer ?
Nous avons adhéré
Actions
Initiatives & Campagnes
Projets
Projets terminés
Ateliers
Webinaires
Conférence Annuelle
Voyages d'étude
Ressources
Transition énergétique
Bonnes pratiques de villes
Publications
Bibliothèques en ligne
EC INFO magazine
Newsletter Energy Cities
Actu "Territoires en Transition"
BLOG
Medias
Communiqués
Articles
Outils de communication

 
Adresses Energy Cities - Besançon Energy Cities - Bruxelles